Introducing the Best Value Quality Checklist in Procurement

Jorn Verweij, Dean Kashiwagi

Abstract


The Best Value Approach (BVA) is a change in paradigm, replacing the non-experts decision making, management, direction, control (MDC) and thinking with the utilization of expertise. The best known BVA model is the Best Value Procurement model (BVP). With the further proliferation of BVP, a growing number of tenders are labelling themselves as “Best Value” without adhering to proper BVA practices. These “hybrid” tenders produce discouraging results, and have a detrimental effect on the wider proliferation of BVA and BVP. An easy-to-use tool is proposed that requires no BVA expertise to assess whether a tender is in fact run as a BV tender, and which may be used to avoid or minimize decision making. A “BV Quality Checklist in Procurement” is established by applying first principles to the Pre-Qualification, Selection and Clarification phase. The three phases have been analyzed with the focus on avoiding all types of decision making resulting in 21 checks. Using the checklist it can be assessed whether a tender procedure is a BV tender. The checklist can also assist in avoiding decision making in the tender process. The approach used here may furthermore be applied in other fields than procurement.


References


Ham, G. P. (2015), Ruling by court of The Hague (the Netherlands), case number: C/09/490634 /KG ZA 15-877, September 16, 2015.

Hutten, J. (2016), Demming en Seddon in Best Value, chapter 3 in (van de Rijt, 2016).

Kashiwagi, D. (2016). 2016 Best Value Approach. Kashiwagi Solution Model (KSM), Mesa, Arizona.

Kashiwagi, D. (2016a). 2016 Information Measurement Theory with the “Kashiwagi Story”. Kashiwagi Solution Model (KSM), Mesa, Arizona.

Rivera, A., Kashiwagi, J., Kashiwagi D. (2016), Improving the Management of Environmental Engineering Projects through the Best Value Project Management Model for a State Agency, Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information & Value, 8(1), 6-1 to 6-34.

Van Abeelen, A., Koreman G., Verheul, D., De Best Value-aanpak: dilemma’s voor de aanbieders, chapter 1 in (Van de Rijt, 2014).

Van de Rijt, J., Santema, S. C. (2013). Prestatieinkoop. Met Best Value Naar Succesvolle Projecten. Graphicom International.

Van de Rijt, J., Santema, S.C. (2012). The Best Value Approach in the Netherlands: A Reflection on Past, Present and Future. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information & Value, 4(2), 147-160.

Van de Rijt, J., Witteveen, W. (2014), Best Value Werkt – Ervaringen uit de praktijk, Gaphicom International.

Van de Rijt, J., Witteveen, W., Santema, S.C. (2016), Best Value Stroomt – Inzichten uit de praktijk, de jurisprudentie en de wetenschap, Graphicom International.

Verweij, J., de Vries, W., Kashiwagi, I., Kashiwagi D. (2015). A Procurement Method that Considers Innovation. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, Vol 7, No 1.

Verweij, J., de Vries, W. (2015a). Use of Best Value for high-value highly-complex medical equipment (presentation). Retrieved http://ksmuniversity.ksm-inc.com/.

Verweij, J. (2016), Introducing Decision Free Solutions© - A Generic, Systemic Approach to Minimize Risk by Avoiding Decision Making. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, Vol 8, No 2.

Verweij, J. (2016a), A legal challenge to BVA! The case, the ruling, the lessons (presentation). Retrieved http://ksmuniversity.ksm-inc.com.

Verweij, J. (2016b), BVA in a new market - Is there a risk of selecting the BVA expert instead of the expert-vendor? Drawing a general lesson from a unique case (presentation). Retrieved http://ksmuniversity.ksm-inc.om

Weller, C., Pritchard, J.M., Maitre, E. (2011). The guiding principles of public procurement

transparency, equal treatment and proportionality; Identifying Opportunities for Sustainable Public Procurement Briefing Series; Briefing No. 3; http://www.clientearth.org/.

Witteveen, W., Van de Rijt, J. (2013). Possible Barriers to a Successful Further Diffusion of the Best Value Approach in the Netherlands: Observations of Major Misunderstandings on the Concept and Theory. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, Vol 5, No 2.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.